Huh? What people want to see VTOL airliners? Can you cite a study please? Most people hate airport security, lack of seat room, being stuck on the tarmac for hours, paying extra for onboard food and checked baggage.
Taking off vertically is not at the top of any passenger's wish list.
As far as short distance travel, it's now faster to drive a car, than to check in and out of two airport less than 300 miles apart, so there is absolutely no market for passenger VTOL. Still a cool aircraft!
The problem with this is that it was British, and built at a time of defence cuts that put all the development costs onto the developers. A big order from the US for 200 never eventuated due to the cost of the Vietnam war iirc, so development was cancelled. What really peeves me is that instead of putting the protypes into an aircraft museum, they were scapped, so these vids are all we have today of this remarkable craft. Imagine it built today with modern materials, fast and safe transport.
Wrong! The problem was Duncan Sands! He ordered that the main British aviation industry companies should merge so Fairy were merged with Westland to make the UK lead Helicopter builder. The Rotodyne was caught in the middle of this. The next problem was the Rotodyne needed development to utilise Tyne engines and upsizing. The newly merged company approached the government for assistance which was turned down. Boeing did not want US forces using a UK aircraft so some bungs were paid!!
Gas was bled off from the turbines and fed to tip jets on the rotorblades - no torque problems which is why it had no tail rotor. After take off, I believe it flew mainly on it's wings and the rotor rotated like an autogyro. On approach to landing, the tip jets were powered up and it made a helicopter style landing. Somehow, it wasn't taken up by any operators although it seems totally plausable and contemporary now. It was brain shatteringly loud on take off if you were outside apparently.
60% Rotor 40% wings. It was not brain shatteringly loud. It was at first but subsequent developement reduced this down to 95db. A new multijet nozzel design would have reduced it to 85db. It was flown into and out of Battersea Heliport several times and nobody noticed.
I used to work in a hanger at White Waltham UK, building car assembly automation some 38 years ago. The rotadyne heli-lift blades were stored in the roof of the building. I also supposed the Rotadyne was stored there.
Grate design !!! Is very sad that such projects like Fairy Rotordyne and Kamov Ka-22 was closed. May be todays rotorcraft world would looking very diferent.
But there's no "helpfull" issue this would solve in "today's market".
Vertical takeoff and landing never has been and never will be necessary for civilian airline flight, airports work just fine.
This would make a cool private transport though! Sign me up!
It's a recurring trend, people wanna see Vtol airliners and personal aircraft.
This IS the answer.
Not to mention the other uses.
Say a Boeing 747 goes down in the ocean.
You can get half of the passengers to safety in one bloody go!
Taking off vertically is not at the top of any passenger's wish list.
As far as short distance travel, it's now faster to drive a car, than to check in and out of two airport less than 300 miles apart, so there is absolutely no market for passenger VTOL. Still a cool aircraft!
A couple of companies, i could rule the world if i could Cite references >.>, have and/or are trying to develop VTOL "Rotodyne" Style craft.
Apparantly retro faux po-mo-futuristic is the way to go.
Is very sad that such projects like Fairy Rotordyne and Kamov Ka-22 was closed.
May be todays rotorcraft world would looking very diferent.